Home » Republicans Need to Say No to War

Republicans Need to Say No to War

by Eric Lumpkins

Crimes against humanity, mass murder, genocide, brutal oppression, and all types of international atrocities pull at our emotions. Our hearts scream for our leaders to do something, anything, in order to liberate the oppressed in the name of humanitarianism. But as history has shown, large-scale foreign interventionism has done far more harm in terms of America’s financial and national security, and in terms of global political stability and prosperity.

Being Policeman of the World Isn’t Conservative

Constitutionalism, which much of conservatism is supposedly and theoretically based upon, began with a vision of a humble foreign policy. No entangling alliances, no getting dragged into international conflicts that were of no benefit to Americans. The only justification for war is in the name of self-defense, not on vague notions of national security and interventionist emotionalism.

It may be little remembered, but the Founders also opposed the existence of a standing army. The best defense is a well-armed populace. The “well-regulated militia,” correctly interpreted, referred to every single American. We, and our right to bear arms, IS the well-regulated militia. The state, the army, the police are NOT the well-regulated militia. The Founders correctly understood that a powerful military force would inevitably be used as a tool for oppressing the citizenry and expanding the power of the state.

There is nothing conservative about spending trillions and trillions of dollars on building bases and stationing troops all around the world. There is nothing conservative about undeclared wars and Congressionally unauthorized bombings and air strikes. There is nothing conservative about giving the executive branch the total power to start destructive wars. Conservatism is rooted in a humble foreign policy, that we should focus on our interests, and not meddle in the affairs of governments worldwide.

The War on Terror Has Created More Terror

Unless you’re as delusional as John Bolton, then it should be painfully obvious now that the War on Terror has been a complete failure. It was never about national security or defending our freedoms. If that were true we would have invaded Saudi Arabia, not Iraq, and we would have brought our troops home after we killed Osama Bin Laden. But these wars were never meant to be won, they were meant to be fought indefinitely.

The War on Terror has only created more terrorism and more global instability. Millions of lives have been lost and trillions of dollars spent, only for the problems to be worse than ever. Stability will never be brought to the Middle East through installing dictators, arming terrorist rebel groups, and then toppling said dictators. The evidence is blatantly clear, foreign interventionism has created far more harm than good.

Power Corrupts, It Always Has

The reasons for intervening always begin with well-intentioned reasons that sound extremely convincing. The conflicts always begin through a belief in humanitarianism and liberating the oppressed and fighting injustice, but it always seem to end in the deaths of countless innocents and the empowerment of atrocious leaders and groups.

Whether it be the United States (Republican & Democrat) arming and installing horrific dictators who committed mass genocide, directly arming numerous terrorist groups through the decades, knowingly implementing embargoes that led to deaths of hundreds of thousands, knowingly striking highly important pharmaceutical plants that killed thousands due to destruction of medicine, and countless countless other atrocities, the history is perfectly clear that power corrupts.

The power to defend our nation should be in the hands of the people. When we entrust enormous military power and trillions of dollars to a small group of politicians, getting them to act in the interests of the majority of the people and not for the interests of the military-industrial complex becomes an impossible task. Power and money talk, not true national security. National security would be bringing our troops home, not supporting the interests of Saudi Arabian dictators.

You may also like

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com